| |
1996 Hydrogen Future Act
The California Hydrogen Business Council
For release: October 10, 1996
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Committee on Science
ROBERT S. WALKER, PENNSYLVANIA, CHAIRMAN
George E. Brown, Jr., California,
Ranking Democrat Member
PRESIDENT SIGNS WALKER HYDROGEN INITIATIVE
INTO LAW
Washington, DC - October 10, 1996 -- House Science Committee Chairman Robert S. Walker's (R-PA) years of
advocacy to dedicate more research and development into hydrogen as an alternative fuel
resource ended in success yesterday when President Bill Clinton signed the Hydrogen Future
Act, H.R. 4138, into law.
The main purpose of the Hydrogen Future Act is to provide
for a basic research and development program, under the auspices of the Department of
Energy (DOE), to explore the uses of hydrogen as a fuel which will encourage private
sector investment in the development of new and better enabling technologies. H.R. 4138
directs the Secretary of Energy to focus more resources into basic research on this
abundant and renewable fuel. Hydrogen is the perfect transition fuel for the future
because it can be utilized in air transportation, ground transportation, stationary
utility use and heating and cooling. Producing only water as a by-product, hydrogen is the
cleanest alternative fuel resource available.
Stated Chairman Walker on the President's signing of the
Hydrogen Future Act, "I am pleased the President joined with the 104th
Congress to take the next step towards developing our most promising,
environmentally-friendly fuel resource. Over the years, I have been asked, why hydrogen?
Hydrogen is one of the solutions for the energy needs of the future. I believe it is one
of the best solutions because it is abundant, clean, renewable, and can be used as an
energy source in almost everything."
The passage and signing of the Hydrogen Future Act
signifies Chairman Walker's twenty years of advocating research and development in
hydrogen as an alternative fuel resource. During the 1980's and 1990's, the Science
Committee held several hearings on hydrogen, and Congress eventually passed legislation
directing DOE to provide a separate line item for hydrogen research in its budget request.
In 1990, Congress passed the Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Research Development, and
Demonstration Program Act (P.L. 101-566). This legislation directed DOE to develop a
Hydrogen Implementation Plan which was completed in 1993, however, hydrogen R&D failed
to receive a high priority in DOE budgets over the ensuing years and Chairman Walker
intensified his congressional efforts.
In 1994, Chairman Walker was recognized by the National
Hydrogen Association for his leadership on hydrogen by receiving the Spark M. Matsunaga
Memorial Hydrogen Award. Last year, H.R. 655, a similar bill, passed the House with an
overwhelming majority on May 2, 1995. H.R. 4138, which was approved by Congress on
September 28, 1996, incorporates some changes made to the earlier bill to accommodate
interests of Members of the Senate. A public law number has not yet been assigned.
Hydrogen Future Act of 1996
Public Law
104-271
H.R. 4138
(Now Public Law 104-271)
Hydrogen Future Act of 1996
[Enrolled Bill (Sent to President)]
One Hundred Fourth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the
third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six.
An Act
To authorize the hydrogen research, development, and demonstration
programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the Hydrogen Future Act of
1996.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
- For purposes of Titles II and III
- the term Department means the Department of Energy;
and
- the term Secretary means the Secretary of Energy.
TITLE IHYDROGEN
SEC. 101. PURPOSES AND DEFINITIONS.
- Section
102(b)(1) of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12401(b)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
(1) to direct the Secretary of Energy to conduct a
research, development, and demonstration program leading to the production, storage,
transport, and use of hydrogen for industrial, residential, transportation, and utility
applications;
- Section
102(c) of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12401(c)) is amended
- in subsection (1) by striking ; and inserting
;;
- by redesignating subsection (2) as subsection (3); and
- by inserting before subsection (3) (as redesignated) the following
new subsection:
(2) Department means the
Department of Energy; and.
SEC. 102. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.
- Section
103 of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12402) is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 103. Report to Congress
(a) Not later than January 1, 1999, the Secretary shall
transmit to Congress a detailed report on the status and progress of the programs
authorized under this Act.
(b) A report under subsection (a) shall include, in
addition to any views and recommendations of the Secretary
(1) an analysis of the effectiveness of the programs
authorized under this chapter, to be prepared and submitted to the Secretary by the
Hydrogen Technical Advisory Panel established under section 108 of this Act; and
(2) recommendations of the Hydrogen Technical Advisory
Panel for any improvements in the program that are needed, including recommendations for
additional legislation..
- Section
108(d) of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12407(d)) is amended
- by adding and at the end of paragraph (1);
- by striking ; and at the end of paragraph (2) and
inserting a period; and
- by striking paragraph (3).
SEC. 103. HYDROGEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
- Section
104 of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12403) is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 104. Hydrogen Research and Development
(a) The Secretary shall conduct a hydrogen research and
development program relating to production, storage, transportation, and use of hydrogen,
with the goal of enabling the private sector to demonstrate the technical feasibility of
using hydrogen for industrial, residential, transportation, and utility applications.
(b) In conducting the program authorized by this section,
the Secretary shall
(1) give particular attention to developing an
understanding and resolution of critical technical issues preventing the introduction of
hydrogen into the marketplace;
(2) initiate or accelerate existing research in critical
technical issues that will contribute to the development of more economic hydrogen
production and use, including, but not limited to, critical technical issues with respect
to production (giving priority to those production techniques that use renewable energy
resources as their primary source of energy for hydrogen production), liquefaction,
transmission, distribution, storage, and use (including use of hydrogen in surface
transportation); and
(3) survey private sector hydrogen activities and take
steps to ensure that research and development activities under this section do not
displace or compete with the privately funded hydrogen research and development activities
of United States industry.
(c) The Secretary is authorized to evaluate any reasonable
new or improved technology, including basic research on highly innovative energy
technologies, that could lead or contribute to the development of economic hydrogen
production, storage, and utilization.
(d) The Secretary is authorized to evaluate any reasonable
new or improved technology that could lead or contribute to, or demonstrate the use of,
advanced renewable energy systems or hybrid systems for use in isolated communities that
currently import diesel fuel as the primary fuel for electric power production.
(e) The Secretary is authorized to arrange for tests and
demonstrations and to disseminate to researchers and developers information, data, and
other materials necessary to support the research and development activities authorized
under this section and other efforts authorized under this chapter, consistent with section 106 of this Act.
(f) The Secretary shall carry out the research and
development activities authorized under this section only through the funding of research
and development proposals submitted by interested persons according to such procedures as
the Secretary may require and evaluate on a competitive basis using peer review. Such
funding shall be in the form of a grant agreement, procurement contract, or cooperative
agreement (as those terms are used in chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code).
(g) The Secretary shall not consider a proposal submitted
by a person from industry unless the proposal contains a certification that reasonable
efforts to obtain non-Federal funding for the entire cost of the project have been made,
and that such non-Federal funding could not be reasonably obtained. As appropriate, the
Secretary shall require a commitment from non-Federal sources of at least 50 percent of
the cost of the development portion of such a proposal.
(h) The Secretary shall not carry out any activities under
this section that unnecessarily duplicate activities carried out elsewhere by the Federal
Government or industry.
(i) The Secretary shall establish, after consultation with
other Federal agencies, terms and conditions under which Federal funding will be provided
under this chapter that are consistent with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing
Measures referred to in section 101(d)(12) of the Uruguay Round Agreement Act (19 U.S.C.
3511(d)(12))..
- (1) Section 2026(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C.
13436(a)) is amended by striking , in accordance with sections 3001 and 3002 of this
Act,.
(2) Effective October 1, 1998, section 2026 of
the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13436) is repealed.
SEC. 104. DEMONSTRATIONS.
Section
105 of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12404) is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:
(c) The Secretary shall require a commitment from
non-Federal sources of at least 50 percent of the cost of any demonstration conducted
under this section..
SEC. 105. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
Section
106(b) of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12405(b)) is amended by adding to the end of
the subsection the following:
The Secretary shall also foster the exchange of generic,
nonproprietary information and technology, developed pursuant to this chapter, among
industry, academia, and the Federal Government, to help the United States economy attain
the economic benefits of this information and technology..
SEC. 106. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
- Section
109 of Public Law 101-566 (42 U.S.C. 12408) is amended
- by striking to other Acts and inserting under
other Acts;
- by striking and from the end of paragraph (2);
- by striking the period from the end of paragraph (3) and inserting
;; and
- by adding at the end of the section the following:
(4) $14,500,000 for fiscal year 1996;
(5) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;
(6) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;
(7) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;
(8) $35,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and
(9) $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2001..
TITLE IIFUEL CELLS
SEC. 201. INTEGRATION OF FUEL CELLS WITH HYDROGEN PRODUCTION
SYSTEMS.
- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
section, and subject to the availability of appropriations made specifically for this
section, the Secretary of Energy shall solicit proposals for projects to prove the
feasibility of integrating fuel cells with
- photovoltaic systems for hydrogen production; or
- systems for hydrogen production from solid waste via gasification
or steam reforming.
- Each proposal submitted in response to the solicitation under this
section shall be evaluated on a competitive [basis] using peer review. The Secretary is
not required to make an award under this section in the absence of a meritorious
proposals.
- The Secretary shall give preference, in making an award under this
section, to proposals that
- are submitted jointly from consortia including academic
institutions, industry, State or local governments, and Federal laboratories; and
- reflect proven experience and capability with technologies
relevant to the systems described in subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2).
- In the case of a proposal involving development or demonstration,
the Secretary shall require a commitment from non-Federal sources of at least 50 percent
of the cost of the development or demonstration portion of the proposal.
- The Secretary shall establish, after consultation with other
Federal agencies, terms and conditions under which Federal funding will be provided under
this title that are consistent with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
referred to in section 101(d)(12) of the Uruguay Round Agreement Act (19 U.S.C.
3511(d)(12)).
SEC. 202. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated, for activities under
this section, a total of $50,000,000 for fiscal years 1997 and 1998, to remain available
until September 30, 1999.
TITLE IIIDOE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PROGRAM QUALITY
SEC. 301. TEMPORARY APPOINTMENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL
EXPERTS IN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS.
- The Secretary, utilizing authority under other applicable law and
the authority of this section, may appoint for a limited term, or on a temporary basis,
scientists, engineers, and other technical and professional personnel on leave of absence
from academic, industrial, or research institutions to work for the Department.
- The Department may pay, to the extent authorized for certain other
Federal employees by section 5723 of title 5, United States Code, travel expenses for any
individual appointed for a limited term or on a temporary basis and transportation
expenses of his or her immediate family and his or her household goods and personal
effects from that individuals residence at the time of selection or assignment to
his or her duty station. The Department may pay such travel expenses to the same extent
for such an individuals return to the former place of residence from his or her duty
station, upon separation from the Federal service following an agreed period of service.
The Department may also pay a per diem allowance at a rate not to exceed the daily amounts
prescribed under section 5702 of title 5 to such an individual, in lieu of transportation
expenses of the immediate family and household goods and personal effects, for the period
of his or her employment with the Department. Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
the employers contribution to any retirement, life insurance, or health benefit plan
for an individual appointed for a term of one year or less, which could be extended for no
more than one additional year, may be made or reimbursed from appropriations available to
the Department.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.
| |
|
THE ICHC SHORT LIST
|

1)
The Riversimple Open Source Car Design
Are Our Designs Free?
Patrick's blog
40 Fires Foundation June 19, 2009
How does open source car design work?
The honest answer is that we won't know until we have done
it. But we have plenty of ideas, which will develop over the coming months
as we share the designs for the Riversimple technology demonstrator and
start to produce collaboratively a production prototype.
There are lots of inspiring examples from open source
software, and we are being advised by people with experience in this area.
But there are many differences between open source hardware and software
design.
Differences between open source hardware and software
There are some major differences between open source software
and hardware design:
- There is a "gap" between the on-line design work and the finished
product delivered to the consumer. Not only is there substantial physical
testing to be done, but also there is significant work to be done to turn
the designs into an actual functioning product (we like the analogy of a
food recipe – a recipe is not a meal, you need a chef to turn it into a
meal). The answer we believe lies in establishing the right relationship
between 40 Fires and the manufacturers (the first of which is Riversimple),
where each party has its needs met.
- There’s a technical challenge to share ideas on-line, where there is
no satisfactory open source CAD (Computer-Aided Design) application. Our
solution is to use a low tech approach at first, using a wiki-based
website and freely available 3-D viewers to show the 3-D drawings. In time
we may get involved in developing a OS CAD program.
- Licensing. We cannot simply take the standard OS software license
(the GPL is the most common), since we are dealing with hardware, which is
not so well protected by copyright. See further down for some thoughts on
the licensing issues.
We'd like to hear from you!
As in Open Source software projects, we are not attempting to
do everything at once and we don’t have to. The designs that Riversimple
is licensing to 40 Fires resemble in many ways the code base which a
complex software project starts with.
However, because a car is different to software and requires
different development stages and processes, we will be asking for input
into specific areas, as well as procedural matters.
That's why we would like to hear from you, not only from
engineers or designers, but also if you have contributed to large scale
open source software projects and can help set up our project management
structure. Lawyers with an understanding of copyright and patents would
also be useful as we review the most appropriate license to use and if and
how we should be using patents for some new inventions which emerge.
To get involved, send an e-mail to
participate@40fires.org explaining your interest and skills.
The stages
We envisage different stages:
Stage 1 Over the coming months, starting this month (July
2009), we will make available design schematics from the Riversimple
technology demonstrator vehicle, together with a description of each
component's function in the whole system, and a vehicle design brief for
the production prototype. We will provide a mailing list or discussion
forum to enable comments and discussions. At this stage we expect
Riversimple, as the creator of the original designs, to be leading the
discussions.
Stage 2 As the detailed discussions develop, we expect a
broad consensus to emerge amongst the participants as to which is the best
solution to pursue for each design . By this stage, we expect the
conversations to be more democratic, with a broad cross-section of
collaborators participate, sharing their knowledge and insights.
Stage 3 We start creating detailed designs collaboratively
and publishing them on-line. Eventually an entire vehicle will be created,
and tested, on-line. We are aiming to complete the design of the
production prototype by the summer of 2010.
Stage 4 Riversimple and other entrepreneurs, under license
from 40 Fires, can start downloading the schematics and building and
testing the vehicles. With the lessons from this, work can start on an
improved production prototype.
Are our designs free (as in beer)?
Richard Stallman famously said that free software is "free as
in speech not free as in beer."
Are our designs free?
We consider that the designs themselves will be free in the
sense of free speech, with one exception. Currently we have chosen a
Creative Commons, non-commercial license. So the designs can be used,
modified, distributed under the same license terms but not for commercial
purposes.
We have chosen to be conservative at this stage and not
allowed commercial use. This may change - we intend to set up a discussion
group to debate this. The issue is that we don't want a large,
profit-focused organisation taking the designs and starting manufacturing
with them yet. We intend that when we grant a manufacturing license, this
will be for a small fee (say $10 per car) to cover 40 Fires running costs.
We are also keen on collaborating so if a commercial
organisation wants to use the designs, we'd like to chat with them first
before allowing them to use the designs for commercial purposes.
The licensing issues are very complex (patent law is not
copyright law; cars are not software) and we don't pretend to have all the
answers. It is quite possible that our license may in the end not meet the
strict requirements of the Free Software Foundation. But all we really
care about is that the license works to ensure that the cars can be built
in hundreds of different variations around the world, by local companies
and entrepreneurs as well as big multinationals if they like, and that no
one company (whether Ford or Riversimple) can dominate the market and keep
the ideas to itself. |
|